atomic v.s. non-numerical
Human experience fundamentally has no clear boundaries. (non-numerical)
https://gyazo.com/790949bae8daf0c83ae56ece1a3a5237
Someone thinks about making the page description atomic (atomic)
Evergreen notes should be atomic.
"Experiential Processes and the Creation of Meaning" Study Group 2#61fb7267aff09e00007d64b2
Gendlin's expression
https://gyazo.com/c5e15cac8079f9649b2686744b51776c
It contrasts experiencing with AN EXPERIENCE.
Experiencing (=experiencing process) is countless
By specifying, selecting, and creating symbols for it, it becomes "an experience" (= an experience).
AN EXPERIENCE COUNTED
Creating a page description is creating a cut-out AN EXPERIENCE
Evergreen notes should be atomic.
Notebooks are
write about one thing only.
However, as much as possible
Write so that the whole picture of the matter can be grasped.
is best
There is no guarantee that this best will happen anytime soon.
The experience is NON-NUMERICAL, so I don't know what the scope of "one" is.
It would be more normal if it were not possible.
---
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/atomic v.s. non-numerical using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.